![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Locate a local agent |
In Reply to: Captive vs Independent Insurance Agents posted by Agent on August 05, 2005 at 05:25:21:
Very nice post.
Sounds like you been both places. I was too. Started with NaSE and realized it wasn't best for me or my clients, went independent. Love the UandIWIN group I joined this last year and added their lines to my other independent lines.
Being independent for a self starter like me is like 100 times better.
Jennifer McDonnell
: Benefits of captive agents:
: Starting resources often provided by parent company
: Primarily salary-based
: Direct access to the reinsurance market
: Access to a wider assortment of employee benefits
: Challenges of captive agents:
: Parent company can prohibit cross-selling
: Parent company can discontinue selling certain lines if they view it as unprofitableresulting in loss of clientele
: Inability to refer customers to whom you cannot sell a policy
: Parent companies often push certain policies over others and require agents to meet strict quotas
: Benefits of non-captive agents:
: Freedom from strict regulations of a parent company
: Freedom to cross-sell into other lines of insurance
: Ability to compare price, product and service amongst a variety of insurers
: Ability to sell a policy through another insurer if a primary insurer cannot write the policy
: Challenges of non-captive agents:
: Use of personal resources to start the business
: Profits from sales are usually returned to the business during the first year for advertisements, lead purchases and other resources
: Primarily commission-based