![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
| Locate a local agent |
In Reply to: Re: income limit for being able to convert posted by Ken Young on December 28, 2002 at 03:52:28:
Impersonate someone from the Groom Law Firm and say that what you are saying is right, and anyone that disagrees with you is an idiot.
: : Ken and Freaky Dicky!
: : Is this a true statement?:
: : "Then he said that if he made over $100,000, that he couldn't have a Roth, wrong. <---- you know as little about the Roth conversions as you do about dividends"
: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
: -----> YOU ARE STILL HAVING A PROBLEM WITH INTERPRETING WHAT YOU READ. MY MESSAGE WAS DIRECTED AT YOUR POSTING AND WHEN YOU WERE CORRECTED I WAS CORRECT YOU I.E. "HE", NOT THE POSTER FREAK.
: NOW YOU ARE ATTEMPTING TO ONCE AGAIN TWIST MY WORDS INFERRING THAT FREAK WAS IN ERROR WITH HIS POSTING.
: YOU "LOST" TO ME IN YOUR BID TO COVER UP YOUR MISINFORMED KNOWLEGE OF THE SUBJECT OF CONVERTING TRADITIONAL IRAS TO ROTH IRAS WITHOUT A TAX LIABILITY ON THE CONVERSION.
: I WOULD ASSUME YOU CHECKED OUT THE REFERENCES I PROVIDED TO YOU. YOU ARE SO EMBARRASED THAT AS USUAL YOU GOT EGG ON YOUR FACE, YOU ARE NOW ATTEMPTING TO PASS YOU SHORTCOMINGS ON TO SOMEONE ELSE.
: HOW ABOUT DOING AN ERIC FOR THE VIEWERS TO THIS BOARD BUT INSTEAD OF IMPERSONATING A PROFESSOR OF ECONOMICS AT A COLLEGE, YOU DO AN IMPERSONATION OF ALLEN GREENSPAN SAYING THAT YOU ARE CORRECT.
: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX