|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
| Locate a local agent |
In Reply to: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: UL posted by jax on March 05, 2002 at 20:37:52:
: : : :
: The illustration could be ran with the 3% guarantee, that you have no contro over, and a 4% interest ASSUMPTION.
: WHY DON'T YOU TELL US WHY THE POLICY WOULD LAPSE AT AGE 76, WHEN IT HAD A CASH VALUE OF $78,000 at age 75?? Is that hard to anwer, or would it make you look bad because we both know the policy WOULD NOT LAPSE AT AGE 76.
: I Said at the guarantee it would lapse if it did not perform and she did not pay any more premiums. I am talking the 3% guarantee forget the $78,000 that may not happen as you know the meaning of assumption, assume, you know those who assume make an ass of themselves. I am leaving now but don't worry I'll be back. LOL
