|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
| Locate a local agent |
In Reply to: Re: Re: Re: Re: UL posted by jax on March 05, 2002 at 20:09:56:
: :
: But you said that you couldn't run the illustration at 4%, that you couldn't run it for more that the guarantee of 3%. Now you say that you ran it at the assumption of 5.25, but you said that you couldn't run it for more than the guarantee.
:
: "Jax, first of all I can't run it at 4% since the guaranteed interest rate is 3% and I am not making this up I can't illustrate anything more than is guranteed. Read my lips my Ul stinks."
: Lillie, you are lying to me, and I don't have time to jack aroung with you. Play your silly games with someone you can fool
: : : Your trying to start something and you no it you know very well that all illustration are ran with the guarantee and the assumption of which I can not change either, my program is controlled by my company and I don't care if you believe me or not. If you are looking for a rise in me you are looking in the wrong place. LOL
: : : But I thought you said the interest assumption was 5.25?
: : : How could you illustrate 78K at age 75 using 3% assumption??
: : : OK, so you want to avoid the questions. I thought you really wanted to know. Guess not.
: : : The questions get tough, and you take a hike.
: :
: : : : I said the assumption is 5.25 the gurantee is 3%
